No. 19-6364
Eduardo Duffy, aka Eduardo Duffy-Carrasco v. United States
Tags: citizenship-definition citizenship-laws constitutional-challenge conviction-review due-process equal-protection illegal-reentry judicial-precedent morales-santana severability statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-11-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the decision below conflicts with the Court's instruction in Sessions v. Morales-Santana, 187 S. Ct. 1678, 1699 n.24 (2017), that a defendant may assail his conviction when it rests on the unconstitutional provisions defining who is a citizen
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the decision below conflicts with the Court’s instruction in Sessions v. Morales-Santana, 187 S. Ct. 1678, 1699 n.24 (2017), that a defendant may assail his conviction when it rests on the unconstitutional provisions defining who is a citizen. prefix
Docket Entries
2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 22, 2019)
Attorneys
Eduardo Duffy
Vincent J. Brunkow — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Petitioner
Vincent J. Brunkow — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent