No. 19-6368

Richard Kalinowski v. Illinois

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2019-10-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-commitment civil-rights constitutional-review due-process liberty liberty-interest pre-trial-detention speedy-trial standard-of-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-11-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the right to a speedy trial in a civil commitment case require the Courts to apply a more strict standard of review due to the loss of liberty involved?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 7 i. Does the right to a speedy trial in a civil commitment case, ; require the Courts to apply a more strict standard of review, . ' due to the loss of liberty involved? | II. Does due process under the United States Constitution, Amendment XIV, §1., require automatic review on at least an annual ; basis, without action of the committed individual, for continued confinement cases involving civilly committed sexual offenders, who are pre-trial detainees, and who have not oo been adjudicated guilty of any crime? — ; Til. Does due process under the United States Constitution, Amend. ‘ment VI, right to a speedy trial, require that the Court in which such right is asserted, assume responsibility to ensure . that the person who has asserted the right, is granted the ; : right? LIST OF ALL PARTIES , : ; All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. : . ; ;

Docket Entries

2019-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.
2019-10-30
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2019-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 22, 2019)
2019-08-31
Application (19A245) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until October 19, 2019.
2019-08-09
Application (19A245) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 20, 2019 to October 19, 2019, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.

Attorneys

Illinois
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent
Richard Kalinowski
Richard A. Kalinowski — Petitioner
Richard A. Kalinowski — Petitioner