Did the Washington State Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court of Washington err by granting as fact that the defendant shared files with the public?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Did The Washington State Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court of Washington Error by granting as fact that the defendant shared files with the Public? 2. Was the Defendent predjudiced by his attorney's failure to request a mirror image copy of his hard drive and/or a copy of RoundUp's source code? 3. Did the defendent recieve effective assistance of counsel? ~ 4. Did the Court of Appeals Error by determining that condition 17 of the defendant's judgement and sentence could be rescued by removing the word "pornography" and including a definition for "sexually explicit material" which exludes "art"? 5, Can art be legally defined, and if not, can an undefined term be defined using another undefined term? fa 4