No. 19-6377
Jerome Gaskin v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: consecutive-sentencing criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining right-to-counsel sixth-amendment trial trial-rights
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-11-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a defendant's right to the effective assistance of counsel during plea bargaining include being accurately advised by counsel of the potential for consecutive sentencing if he is convicted after trial?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED DOES A DEFENDANT’S RIGHT TO THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL DURING PLEA BARGAINING INCLUDE BEING ACCURATELY ADVISED BY COUNSEL OF THE POTENTIAL FOR CONSECUTIVE SENTENCING IF HE IS CONVICTED AFTER TRIAL?
Docket Entries
2019-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.
2019-11-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Jerome Gaskin
Elizabeth L. Jacobs — Suite 1125, Petitioner
Elizabeth L. Jacobs — Suite 1125, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent