No. 19-6383
Nelli Kesoyan v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law appellate-review court-of-appeals criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-appeals federal-jurisdiction federal-procedure legal-interpretation sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Court of Appeals adopt an erroneous interpretation of U.S.S.G. § 251.3(b)(3)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Did the Court of Appeals adopt an erroneous interpretation of U.S.S.G. § 251.3(b)(3)? 1 LIST OF ALL PARTIES The caption of the case in this Court contains the names of all parties (petitioners and the United States). ii
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Nelli Kesoyan
Karen L. Landau — Law Office of Karen L. Landau, P.C., Petitioner
Karen L. Landau — Law Office of Karen L. Landau, P.C., Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent