Whether the State of New York Court of Appeals Ordered directly conflict with the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause Of The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution?

QUESTION PRESENTED ; 1. US visa:.0187 , legal short-term stay, US visa:.0012 , legal study abroad , life injury, can Petitioner get The Equal Protection Clause Of The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution? 2. Only one Hon. Janet DiF ore Chief Judge, presiding, no more Judges, and Petitioner were not heard in a court[A-A]. Whether the State of New York Court of Appeals Ordered directly conflict with the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause Of The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution? 3. No papers having been filed in opposition thereto, no any evidence to support these Orders [A-A],[A-B], [A-C], [A-D], Whether the Order of the lower court directly conflict with an the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution? 4. The failure is shown by date to plead. According to Rule 55, CPLR Rule 320 (a), CPLR 3215(c) , so jurisdiction has been established. But the petitioner cannot obtain a default judgement, is it a violation of the Equal Protection Clause Of The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution? 5. Not fulfilling the obligation to inform, according to the Federal Civil Procedure Rules 37. (b)(2)(A) Is the fact that jurisdiction is asserted has been established? 6. Guttbenberg NJ Police Department modified the report of record of rape, and continued to fake Petitioner‘s Complaint in Memorandum Of Law In Support.Hudson County Prosecutor's Office interrogated the petitioner as a prostitute, and threatened Petitioner at intimidation, and destroyed the record and Petitioner’s exhibit at last. Refused to to fulfill these obligation as by law enact. whether it is perjury; defamation; dereliction of duty ;Conspiracy against rights? that whether it is intentional act for refusing to an the Equal Protection, Deprivation of rights under color of law. under: Perjury generally, 18 U.S. Code § 1621; Defamation, 28 U.S. Code § 4101; Conspiracy against rights , 18 U.S. Code § 241; Deprivation of rights under color of law, 18 U.S. Code § 242; and, CarePoint Health accepts the chief complaint Sexual Assault, refusal to provide the Standards of comprehensive health care services. No to provide HIV preventives, birth control pills, Whether it is deliberate deprivation of the right to life, Criminal conspiracy? Criminal murder ? under: Examination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and women in labor, 42 USS. Code § 1395dd (b)(1)(d)(2){A). Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights , 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3)? So GJPD, HCPO, CH, whether it is discrimination, and intentional? under: Attorney General Standards for Providing Services to Victims of Sexual Assault { 2nd Edition). Equal access, 42. U.S.C. § 2000 a (a) Racial Discrimination Act, 1975 (13)(b)(18A) (1)(a). 7. Derek Smith Law Group, PLLC barred from access to business services due to the fact Petitioner cannot speak and write English sufficiently. Staten Island Legal Services and Legal Aid Society Breach of loyalty, and stopped the case service. Camba refused agent of appeal of case. Whether it is intentional act for refusing to the Equal Protection, Deprivation of rights under color of law, So, whether it is discrimination, molestation? 8. Garden Of Hope changed the locks of residence, and pried open the lock of wardrobe of Petitioner, stole all personal belongings, whether it is robbery and housebreaking , illegally eviction, breach of promise, discrimination? don't clean up public space sanitation, will be driven out of the shelter, whether it is a threat, intimidation, forced labor? 9. Mount Sinai Health System(“MSHS”), Richmond University Medical Center refused to send Petitioner to hospital for medical tests and treatment for falls hurt. Metropolitan Dental Associates and New York University refused to treat teeth, whether it is discrimination, molestation? MSHS false statement in public that Petitioner was a liar, and recorded into the medical record, whether it is insult and