Whether the court of appeals for the eleventh circuit rendered a decision in conflict with the law of the U.S. Supreme Court

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED _ WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT | RENDERED A DECISION IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW OF THE USS. SUPREME COURT ANNOUNCED IN COPPEDGE -VUS., 369 U.S. 438 (1962); JONES -VCUNNINGHAM, 371 U.S. 236 (1963); CARAFAS -VLAVELLEE, 391 _-U.S, 284 (1968); BAREFOOT -VESTELLE, 463 U.S. 880, 893 (1983); SPENCER V-_KEMNA, 523 US. 1, 7 (1998); BECKER -VMONTGOMERY, 532 U.S. 757 (2001); JONES -VBOCK, 549 U.S. 199, 216 (2007), AND WAS CONTRARY TO 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253(c) WHEN IT DENIED MY REQUEST FOR A COA FROM THE _ DISTRICT COURTS ERRONEOUS DENIAL OF MY 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254(a) PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BASED SOLELY ON PROCEDURAL GROUNDS AND CONTRARY TO JONES -VBOCK, SUPRA? : WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ RENDERED A DECISION IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW OF THE US. SUPREME COURT ANNOUNCED IN JONES -VBOCK, 549 U.S. 199, 216 (2007; BECKER -VMONTGOMERY, 532 U.S. 757, 767-68 (2001(SAME) AND WAS CONTRARY TO 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(6)(4) WHEN IT ERRONEOUSLY DENIED _ _ ME LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS TO APPEAL THE DISTRICT COURT'S ERRONEOUS DISMISSAL W/OUT PREJUDICE MY 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BASED SOLELY ON JURISDICTIONAL GROUNDS CONTRARY TO 28 USS.C. Sections 2254(a); 2241(d); 1915(b)(4); JONES -VCUNNINGHAM, SUPRA, Id, (1963); SPENCER -V. v , KEMNA, SUPRA, Id. (1998)(SAME); BECKER -VMONTGOMERY, SUPRA, Id. (2007)(FACTUALLY THE SAME)?