Whether the Nebraska Supreme Court's denial of the petitioner's right to proceed pro se violated the Sixth Amendment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. WHETHER OR NOT THE NEBRASKA SUPREME COURT OPINION IN AFFIRMING THE NEBRASKA LOWER COURT'S JUDGMENT DENYING PETITIONER THE SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO PROCEED PRO SE, ONNHESSOWN, AS COUNSEL OF . CHOICE, ,WAS CONSTITUTIONALLY INFIRMED AND PREJUDICIAL. II. WHETHER OR NOT THE NEBRASKA SUPREME COURT OPINION IN AFFIRMING THE NEBRASKA LOWER COURT'S JUDGMENT DENYING PETITIONER'S DEFENSE : COUNSEL MOTION TO WITHDRAW BASED UPON DISAGREEMENTS AND CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS ENGENDERED BY DEFENSE COUNSEL AND PETITIONER, CONSTITUTED AN CONSTITUTIONAL INFRINGEMENT IN VIOLATION OF THE PETITPBELTIONER'S FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. III. WHETHER THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE AND PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO COUNSEL OF CHOICE WAS VIOLATED WHEN THE LOWER DISTRICT COURT VIA ITS ORDER DENIED CRIMINAL DEFENDANT HIS RIGHT TO SELF-REPRESENTATION (PRO SE), IN CONJUNCTION WITH A SIMULTANEOUSLY ADJUDICATION WITH DENYING CRIMINAL DEFENDANT'S DEFENSE COUNSEL MOTION TO WITHDRAW FROM REPRESENTATION THEREOF. : i.