Whether the state court decided a federal question in a way that conflicts with this Court's precedent on the right to counsel and due process

No question identified. : I) wh sthse The Stats Moock of last vssorts Decidgdean Morten F2detel Quistion in a wey That Contiicks odibh Whe . | ight Se Counsel ines wictabid-b/@) Counss\s absensiaba Cock, where (0) The Shure" rdenliticabion dS uggzSdive (GQ) Onveliabls (C) va viaintion of Dos Precess fp) swtthne Stas aad Dicidta oo eetent ten | Fedsccl \ad in co Gay That Contricks hth This Couch ian edna —— “Ths ory Crtorard vecdichs Thed Whe £55éntbial Elements oF | CFE EZE Not Pravin, (G) “Ths Sudgs Shotsd, “sn This CASS We a L) Whithir “Tht Sols Cork Cindicsd o Decision ene Fadice\ | Que sti Ao way That Contiicks with This Comm Decision wwhier (o) Comoretive PFE sch OF Pra sicobarial | is mduck,(@) Conbinid tio ts Sat 00S Ci Ae FeAl end $$ ——