No. 19-6424
Anthony Darnell Stokes v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals appellate-review conviction court-of-appeals criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-courts federal-statute obstruction-of-justice sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals misapplied 18 U.S.C.S. § 1512(c)(1)
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS MISAPPLIED 18 U.S.C.S. § 1512(c)(1) (LAWYERS EDITION 2008) WHEN IT AFFIRMED STOKES’S CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE? i STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES United States v. Mathis, et al., No. 3:14CR016, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia. Judgment entered December 15, 2016. United States v. Mathis, et al., No. 16-4633(L), U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Judgment entered July 31, 2019. ii
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 29, 2019)
Attorneys
Anthony Stokes
Paul Graham Beers — Glenn, Feldmann, Darby & Goodlatte, Petitioner
Paul Graham Beers — Glenn, Feldmann, Darby & Goodlatte, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent