No. 19-6425

Andres Santana v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2019-10-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment discovery due-process fourteenth-amendment innocence liberty-interest post-conviction post-conviction-discovery procedural-rights substantive-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

What amount of due process is owed to a Defendant who is seeking post-conviction discovery to prove himself innocent of the charges a jury found him GUILTY of, when the post-conviction discovery sought is covered under a protected liberty interest, under the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : 1. What amount of due process is owed to a Defendant who is seeking post conviction discovery to prove himself innocent of the charges a jury found him GUILTY of, , : when the post conviction discovery sought is covered under a protected liberty interest, under the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment? : 2. When a defendant has a right under a protected liberty interest, under the : Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, in demonstrating his innocence, is a hearing and decision on the merits of his post conviction discovery requests a procedural right, substantive right, or both? ; 3. Is California's procedural framework for hearing post conviction discovery motions in violation of the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment? i .

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-21
Letter of November 14, 2019 from petitioner received.
2019-10-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 29, 2019)

Attorneys

Andres Santana
Andres Santana — Petitioner