No. 19-6443
Amro A. Elansari v. University of Pennsylvania
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-funding informed-consent research-ethics research-experiments standing
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was summary dismissal appropriate?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Federclly Funded, is Subject toFedere| uetsdrctien foe Using fuck Funding in Numer Ceseerch Crxperiments w t-Hrout ia Formed Consent In yvroleaton of US CFR & 6 90.116 Gorercl Reqyirernnts for mFormed corsant, & Federal shetvle [quoter (Suysested Answer Yes, 1. Because He Feder| Funding implecetes He US. Goverment <5 & DeCenlente and 2. Federel Fuading useel te deere Peep oe Har rights Funded by He Ledere! governmert obseously cmplcctes Feder Coastibstnencl cishts )JZ. Wes Semmary Disaissctl appreercte! (no: Sects / plecdtays Were not inferred in ligt most Cavoredble to Pleat f fF ) . RZVLRSLE + ROMAND
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-10-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 29, 2019)