No. 19-6449
Antwoine Marquise Bealer v. Kern Valley State Prison
IFP
Tags: 8th-amendment administrative-decision administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violations due-process in-forma-pauperis judicial-screening PLRA prison prisoner-rights standing
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the PLRA require the court to look beyond a prima facie showing when screening prisoner in forma pauperis complaints?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED oo, DOES THE PLRA REQUIRE THE COURT TO ' LOOK BEYOND AN PRIMA FACIE SHOWING ° WHEN SCREENING PRISONER IN FORMA PAUPERIS COMPLAINTS. ; . DOES DOUBLE JEOPARDY PROTECTIONS APRLY TO ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS ; BY PRISON OFFIGIALS TO SEGREGATE ; | INMATES. a DOES GRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT | APPLY STRICTLY TO HEALTH AND SAFETY. DID THE DISTRICT COURT ABUSE ITS ‘ DISCRETION BY REQUIRING THAT MORE FACT BE RAISED FOR A REASONABLE EXPECTATION THAT DISCOVERY WILL | REVEAL EVIDENCE OF PLEADED | CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS. | oo t , ! : t ! Lo.
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2019)
2019-06-19
Application (18A1341) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 23, 2019.
2019-06-10
Application (18A1341) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 24, 2019 to August 23, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.