No. 19-6456
Geoffrey Baggett v. M. Eliot Spearman, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights confession-suppression custodial-interrogation due-process miranda-rights police-interrogation police-tactics prejudicial-error prejudicial-evidence right-to-counsel self-incrimination
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner's confession should have been excluded from evidence because petitioner was the victim of misleading tactics leading up to being advised of his Miranda rights and did not waive his right to counsel, and continued to be questioned after invoking his right to counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
list of all parties : : ; to the proceeding in the court whose judgment is the subject of this petition is as . follows: ; : . 4G)
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent Spearman, Warden to respond filed.
2019-09-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2019)
Attorneys
Geoffrey Baggett
Geoffrey Baggett — Petitioner
Spearman, Warden
Rene Antonio Chacon — CA Department of Justice, Respondent