No. 19-6466
Relisted (3)IFP
Tags: 18-usc-924(c)(3)(A) aiding-and-abetting armed-bank-robbery crime-of-violence criminal-law federal-criminal-law sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does aiding and abetting armed bank robbery qualify as a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Does aiding and abetting armed bank robbery—which can be accomplished without the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical foree—qualify as a “crime of violence” under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)? ii
Docket Entries
2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2020-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-01-29
Rescheduled.
2020-01-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-02
Memorandum of respondent United States of America filed.
2019-12-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 2, 2020.
2019-12-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 2, 2019 to January 2, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-10-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2019)
Attorneys
Eric Johnson
Christopher Aaron Holt — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Christopher Aaron Holt — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent