Whether the trial court's abuse of discretion in not allowing an alleged accomplice to testify violated the petitioner's due process and Sixth Amendment rights

No question identified. : + 7 QUESTION FOR WHICH REVIEW IS SOUGHT 1.) Whether trial courts abuse of discretion in not allowing an alleged accomplice, and sole defense witness to testify at trial for the defense violated the Petitioners Fourteenth Amendment due process rights and Sixth Amendment and did the decisions of the courts below construct an avenue that allows the State of Indiana of Indiana to bypass the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America? 2.) Whether the Indiana Court of Appeals decision below created a trap for the unwary that will enable the State of Indiana deny due process and imped the appeals process, and did the Petitioner . actually waive ail his rights to appeal any of the evidence seized from his home in violation of the Fourth Amendment and Section One Article Eleven of The Indiana Constitution? 3.) Whether the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled contrary its own Supreme Court This Court and federal and state court of last resorts throughout the United States, ruling that petitioner was not entitled to an instruction on his theory of defense when it upheld the trial court’s refusal of the petitioners instruction that the weight of the Methamphetamine is a factor to consider when deciding whether the defendant had the intent to deal Methamphetamine? And does said ruling allow for the State of Indiana to deny the accused rights guaranteed by the Constitution of The United States of America? 2 ‘ . .