Does the Eleventh Circuit's 'substantial likelihood' test for Article III standing relating to future injuries comport with this Court's 'certainly impending' test that takes aim at whether a future injury is 'too speculative' to adjudicate?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Does the Eleventh Circuit's “substantial likelihood” test for Article ITI standing relating to future injuries comport with this Court’s “certainly impending” test that takes aim at whether a future injury is “too speculative” to adjudicate? 2) When the government indicates it will search a small number of members of a large group at random, do all members of that group have a “real and immediate” injury sufficient to challenge the constitutionality of the search practice?