No. 19-6470
Darrell Lamar Marshall v. George Caram Steeh, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights color-of-law constitutional-rights deprivation district-judge due-process federal-law human-services social-security
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2020-02-28
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did United States District Judge, George C. Steeh, the Social Security Administration, Michigan Department of Human Services, Rehabilitation Services, and United States Distrtict Judge, Bernard A. Friedman Act Under Color of Federal Law to Deprive petitioner of his Constitutional Rights?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1 Did United States District Judge, George C. Steeh, the Social Security Administration, Michigan Department of Human Services, Rehabilitation Services, and United States Distrtict Judge, Bernard A. Friedman Act Under Color of Federal Law to Deprive petitioner of his Constitutional Rights?
Docket Entries
2020-03-02
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2020-02-01
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-11-07
Waiver of right of respondents Limited Appearance for Michigan Department of Human Services, Rehabilitation Services to respond filed.
2019-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2019)
Attorneys
Darrell Marshall
Darrell Lamar Marshall — Petitioner
Limited Appearance for Michigan Department of Human Services, Rehabilitation Services
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent