No. 19-6473

Gelu Topa v. Teofilo Melendez, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights conciseness criminal-procedure due-process exigent-circumstances facts fourth-amendment police-report relevance scotus-petition warrantless-search writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the police violated the Fourth Amendment by conducting a warrantless search of the petitioner's home without exigent circumstances?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED , My case has a lots of facts, but because this court wants me to be concise, | will mention a few, the most important and relevant to my case. In the police report (

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-12
Waiver of right of respondent Teofilo Melendez, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendix

Attorneys

Gelu Topa
Gelu Topa — Petitioner
Gelu Topa — Petitioner
Teofilo Melendez, et al.
Richard Allen Giuffreda — Purdy, Jolly, Giuffreda, Barranco & Jisa, P.A., Respondent
Richard Allen Giuffreda — Purdy, Jolly, Giuffreda, Barranco & Jisa, P.A., Respondent