No. 19-6474
Christopher Andrew Tank v. Michigan
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause confrontation-clause-violation constitutional-rights constitutional-rights-violation criminal-procedure due-process dying-declaration prejudicial-effect sixth-amendment testimonial-dying-declarations testimonial-evidence
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether testimonial dying declarations violate the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. WHETHER TESTIMONIAL DYING DECLARATIONS VIOLATE THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT; AND, WHETHER PETITIONER'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED? (A) WHETHER THE STATEMENTS MADE BY MR. ARCH WERE TESTIMONIAL? (B) WHETHER THE STATEMENTS ELICITED HAD A PREJUDICIAL EFFECT ON THE TRIAL? i
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-07
Waiver of right of respondent Michigan to respond filed.
2019-10-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2019)
Attorneys
Michigan
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent