No. 19-6475
Burton Maurice Kahn v. Robert Ripley
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: affirmative-defense civil-procedure collateral-estoppel due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure merits res-judicata standing
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether res judicata or collateral estoppel should apply when the initial trial did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the merits
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : 1 QUESTON(S) PRESENTED , 1. Ifin the initial trial, the Court refused to hear litigation of the merits, . should future Courts apply res judicata or collateral estoppel to the initial judgment when the initial trial did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue of merits? 2. Cana Court claim res judicata when the defendant did not plead an affirmative defense per Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 8, without a cite from any authority?
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-27
Waiver of right of respondent Robert Ripley to respond filed.
2019-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2019)
Attorneys
Robert Ripley
E. Conry Davidson — Elizabeth Conry Davidson, Attorney at Law, Respondent
E. Conry Davidson — Elizabeth Conry Davidson, Attorney at Law, Respondent