Was the petitioner denied due process of law in violation of the 14th Amendment?

No question identified. : Question resented 1) Was the Petitioner denied due process of law,in Wolation of the 14 Amendment toy The circumstance thal the feditiones conviction was affirmed vnler a ctiminal Statute for a violation of which Pekitioner hed mat een dhorged wih? 2) Was The Pebitioner denied Ave grocess of lawsin violation & the 4% Rerendment bu The circumstance That the Cetitroner’s arrest and prosecution resulted From Fundamental unfceurness ? List of tarties AW pasties appear Aw the caption oF The case on the cover page Tale of Contents . page Domb er Opinions. nelow . moe . . . AN Socisdic tow an : : , eo. » a Constitutional and Statutory Provisions Envolved rn) Statement & The tose . . ; . . . bReason for Gronking the Writ . . sok 7 Conclusion : . : . . . rn Relief Soot . . . . . : . 7 Prayer for RelieS : . . . . » (8 Tadexr to Appendices Regendik f\ Aoloarnc Coo & Criminal fp peals orber Regandik 6 Tnesdent | offense Report Rependix c Arvest Warrent Apgendix Dd Trvestiqaters Leg . Mppendin = E Chronological Sequence — Regendix E — Rerest Regert Keped © Troe Bill Regemdin A Ladictment Regenare Letter From Dik. Spencer Waller te The Ralaarra Stoke Bar, OStce AF General Loonsed ; Sopreme Court of Xhe United Skates Petition for Writ of Wolseas Coreus ReA\tiower respect futy prays Thor a Petition Sor Writ of Habeas Corpus issue To veview he judge mont eho and The Nega\ty & incarcer aXion, Opinions Below TH For cases Scovn State Courts * The opinion oF Lhe Aloloama Court of Crininol Ageeals aggeats of Apgendig A To The. pet Wiow owd is @ is ungoldished. Juris die tirow The jurisdiction of {his court is involwd Unter 28 0.5.0. § 1651 (A\ and/or & gas (oh, Constitutronal and Stafuory Provisions Tovelved aye Aenendenent Xo UES. Consttotin | . : » AQT g™ Raend ment Xo US, Constitotion — . ‘ . . Tit : 4 Amendment to WS, Constitation | . . ‘ 47 38 usc. Saas (DY) 2. , : 7 fo : Talle of Authorities Cited Cases page umber Loammoamn J, Stoke , 820 Se, ad 16a , . . ; ; . 4s Cole uy. Arkansas, 333 0.5. 14201 AA L.ELAI G44 68 SSI 4, \5 Eq. Hovey us EWiok GT US. 404, HUG-420, 48 L.Ed aI IT See BH | | Ex paste Gozemon WSS Aa. MW O3 Sab WiC. . . . , 8 Ex parks Wor per y S44 Sond W8h (xaaty . . : . . ; 8 Ex poste Lewis, BW $0.29 Hes (Alarool) . . 2 AAS Ex parte Walters WE 6135232 at * 5 (hia. oct. dole) . . , wB Ex garte Willison , 264 Ala. 263,100 soa 443 Casas. . . , 8 Hamilton J. Avtaoge County 5284 Ala. 414,268 Saad 3o(rd) 8,13 Rombton Wy. Rutooqa County y Sopra + . . . . ; ' 8 Kascison v. State \ Ries Crise. Ape, bexis 97 (Ala. Crinn Age. Bec. 18,2015), . Warrison vi Stahe \WhGaG3sis at 4 (Ae crim Age Del ros) 3 Rooker \ Sugra ; . . . . . . . , es) Kiwlacell y. States 272 Ala HA, 132 Sod 1Za(iaed |, . . 8 mibechell v. Melle County \ 244 Ata. 130, 313 $0.23 172 . . . . 8 Quen vy. Maloney 844 Fab 536,54 CU cir. 1488) . . . 8 Stoke exser. Graddic v. Teosens$. (ok) Urd, Ain. 377 Sod 440-(1474) . _ As Statores Alabama Code (1974) ~& ign-a-2308) . wo. . . . . : , 10 8 \3A-3-a3(e) . Coo . . ; ; ' ~ {0 & (3A-6-2 ; Coo . . . | § \3A-10-4 . en . . . . . . an) § 13A(o-oo (ty . , , . . . aac SA\BA-to-(oo (3), no soe . . . . Lu Statutes 90.92 ournlnes Alaleama Code (1815) \4 § (3Ato~ Lol NO & \3A(o103 ~ Alaloanna Roles Ceiminsh Procedure. Rute 13.2.0) 7 Alabama Bar Association, Qukes oh Crokessioma Conduct Rule 3.3 (a(1) (4 Otes Avihorities , Holy Bille 1 Kins, Sames Version (6 Mere Tama Weoster Dicktomany (20 oS 10 5 SNakemend of the Case: Ow Marsch 18, 20\\, Pekitioner was arrested oud Charges witty morjer parses” Malooma Cade 1475 §13A-6-a(aCD Ow May 16,2012 | Petitioner was Sound godky as charged im the indictment, — Ow Felocvasy V, L013 the Alabama Lourt of Criminal Aopeats cftirmes conviction. On Samvary 3t, L014, Petitioner Filed a Role 32 petition raining Tacffective Assistance & Counsel. Ow December A, 2015, the Alabama Supreme. Court issued a Cert fate af Dhgement aFricming The denial oF Che Role 3a, Ow Secemloer 14, AOIS