No. 19-6502
Cory Dale Fields v. United States
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process federal-district-court federal-sentencing grand-jury no-bill prior-conduct reliability reliability-of-evidence reliability-standard sentencing sentencing-considerations uncharged-conduct
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2020-03-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is alleged prior uncharged conduct that had been no-billed by a Grand Jury sufficiently reliable for a federal district court to consider at sentencing?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Is alleged prior uncharged conduct that had been no-billed by a Grand Jury sufficiently reliable for a federal district court to consider at sentencing? il PARTIES Petitioner: Cory Dale Fields Respondent: United States of America
Docket Entries
2020-03-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2020-02-05
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2019-12-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 5, 2020.
2019-12-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 6, 2020 to February 5, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 6, 2020.
2019-11-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 6, 2019 to January 6, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 6, 2019)
Attorneys
Cory Dale Fields
William Reynolds Biggs — WILLIAM R. BIGGS, PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent