No. 19-6504
Franklin Roosevelt McGee v. United States
Relisted (3)IFP
Tags: 18-usc-924 armed-career-criminal-act criminal-law criminal-offense mens-rea recklessness statutory-interpretation violent-felony
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a criminal offense that can be committed with a mens rea of recklessness qualifies as a 'violent felony' for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. 924(e)(2)(B)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether a criminal offense that can be committed with a mens rea of recklessness qualifies as a “violent felony” for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. 924(e)(2)(B). ii
Docket Entries
2021-07-23
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2021-06-21
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Borden</i> v. <i>United States</i>, 593 U. S. ___ (2021).
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2020-02-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2020-02-18
Rescheduled.
2020-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-06
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2019-11-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 6, 2020.
2019-11-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 6, 2019 to January 6, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-10-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 6, 2019)
Attorneys
Franklin Roosevelt McGee
Doris Randle-Holt — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent