No. 19-6505
Michael Ingram v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 21-usc-851 21-usc-851-enhancement 28-usc-2255 28-usc-2255-f-4 federal-law federal-procedure federal-sentencing geographic-disparities geographic-disparity habeas-corpus sentencing-commission sentencing-commission-report statute-of-limitations statutory-interpretation time-limit time-limitation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Where the United States Sentencing Commission publishes a report summarizing the geographic disparities in the application of the 21 U.S.C. §851 enhancement, but the true extent of the disparities are not reported until years later, when does the one-year time limit found in 28 U.S.C. §2255(f)(4) for bringing claims begin to run?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Where the United States Sentencing Commission publishes a report summarizing the geographic disparities in the application of the 21 U.S.C. §851 enhancement, but the true extent of the disparities are not reported until years later, when does the one-year time limit found in 28 U.S.C. §2255(f)(4) for bringing claims begin to run?
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-10-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 6, 2019)
Attorneys
Michael Ingram
Shelley Ann Goff — Goff and Goff Attomeys, Petitioner
Shelley Ann Goff — Goff and Goff Attomeys, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent