No. 19-6509
William Gaudet v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-2423(a) appeals-court appellate-review conviction criminal-sentencing district-court evidence-exclusion evidence-rule-403 federal-rules-of-evidence federal-sentencing-guidelines judgment-of-acquittal motion-in-limine prior-testimony sentencing standard-of-review whether-the-appeals-court-erred-in-upholding-the-d
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the appeals court erred in upholding the district court's denial of the petitioner's motion in limine
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. WHETHER THE APPEALS COURT ERRED IN UPHOLDING THE DISTRICT COURT’S DENIAL OF THE PETITIONTER’S MOTION JN LIMINE SEEKING TO EXCLUDE THE PRIOR TESTIMONY OF JENNY G. AND THE RESULTING CONVICTION. Il. WHETHER THE APPEALS COURT ERRED IN UPHOLDING THE DISTRICT COURT’S DENIAL OF THE PETITIONTER’S MOTION FOR A JUDGEMENT OF ACQUITTAL. I. WHETHER THE APPEALS COURT ERRED IN UPHOLDING THE DISTRICT COURT’S SENTENCING OF THE PETITIONER TO LIFE IN PRISON AS TO COUNT ONE AND THIRTY YEARS IN PRISON AS TO COUNT TWO. i
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 6, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
William Gaudet
Peter J. Cyr — Law Offices of Peter J. Cyr, Petitioner
Peter J. Cyr — Law Offices of Peter J. Cyr, Petitioner