No. 19-6511

Roberto Trinidad Del Carpio Frescas v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-procedure fifth-circuit mandatory-victims-restitution-act preponderance-of-evidence preponderance-of-the-evidence reliable-evidence restitution restitution-standard sentencing
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

What is the meaning of 'reliable evidence' for establishing the amount of restitution under the Mandatory Victim's Restitution Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3663A?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether this Court should clarify what “reliable evidence” means for establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, the amount of restitution under the Mandatory Victim’s Restitution Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3663A. No. In the Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 2019 ROBERTO TRINIDAD DEL CARPIO FRESCAS, Petitioner, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Petitioner Roberto Trinidad Del Carpio Frescas asks that a writ of certiorari issue to review the opinion and judgment entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on June 20, 2019.

Docket Entries

2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2019)

Attorneys

Roberto Trinidad Del Carpio Frescas
Judy Fulmer MadewellFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent