No. 19-6513

Deyoe R. Harris v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2nd-amendment civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-review controlled-substances criminal-justice drug-policy due-process federal-law federalism free-speech sentencing-disparity standing takings
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the federal prohibition on certain substances has resulted in more crime and violence, and whether it is best to regulate or decriminalize these substances

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED } C1) Ts + cleac that liWe one hunadced years ago poth dieono| the the ogterght ban of a sustonce has resulted in more crime and violence abou} that ning, | Coc ALL Ja mecteans? ; ODIs tk best te STIG PERO ERIE a and SOL hese Substances hecause pesple “will use Hnved sulostoanees CoV WO y iV brah at lo tn imormgonment and violence, eb rw best or ove common tite s ? (3) Ts the conttect regulated b She Fecleradly Conthal eel Substance Act (CSA (1971079 exeemearng sught we left ts the walivrdoal or The Fesple 56 Hee at vialoter the IO Admedmweat and is unsonstitotrana lL ? 4) Are the laws created b lic resecenaa’ anal ug reyesetores af -ne sits ins Hppendix Co ( (| Seles) an okbecmrocten thot The resple. me the > ath (CSA (12700) an ovecreach. 6F legestative Power |

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2019)

Attorneys

Deyoe R. Harris
Deyoe Royal Harris — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent