No. 19-6513

Deyoe R. Harris v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2nd-amendment civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-review controlled-substances criminal-justice drug-policy due-process federal-law federalism free-speech sentencing-disparity standing takings
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)

①Is it clear that like one hondred years ago with
esulted in
ALL
Americans?
or
2sayt x0t pvo apogba hds o4 t2g SI②
ubstances because
people will use thesubstances
70
enyway, in light
both
imprisonment and violence
it isbest
for
our commonities!
nowing
③Is the conduct regulated by
the Federally Controlled
(CSA(1970))
that ought
Substance Act
something
The People
obe left to the
irdiridval
or
so the
the
l0thAdmendment and is
vrolates
c
nconstitutional?
④Are
the
created by public referenda and
laws
Appendix C
regeslatures
of the
States
iN
People think the
I States) an affermation that The

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the federal prohibition on certain substances has resulted in more crime and violence, and whether it is best to regulate or decriminalize these substances

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2019)

Attorneys

Deyoe R. Harris
Deyoe Royal Harris — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent