No. 19-6522
IFP
Tags: blood-draw constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-interpretation mandatory-blood-draw missouri-v-mcneely probable-cause public-safety search-and-seizure texas-transportation-code warrantless-search
Key Terms:
Environmental Arbitration SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental Arbitration SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the Texas Department of Public Safety Troopers' mandatory blood draw constitutional under the Fourth Amendment as interpreted by Missouri v. McNeely?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , 1.) Was the Texas De artment of Public Safety Troopers David penbied Shieute of Petitioners bleod neder Texas Transportation Code Sect. 724.012(b,) 2B) (Texas’ Mandatory blood draw Statule) Constitutional, aS applied, under the Four th Amendment as interpreted by Che Supreme Cour€ tuling in Missouri V. McNeely, |33 5.CE. 1552 (2013) 2 “
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-10-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2019)