No. 19-654

Kaleida Health, dba Buffalo General Medical Center v. Kathleen Biondo

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-21
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: circuit-split civil-rights damages due-process eleventh-circuit gebser-standard gebser-v-lago-vista intentional-discrimination monetary-damages official official-decision rehabilitation-act second-circuit standing
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Gebser standard applies to the Rehabilitation Act

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED A claimant may assert a claim for monetary damages under the Rehabilitation Act if there was intentional discrimination. Barnes v. Gorman, 536 U.S. 181 (2002). However, neither this Court nor Congress have set clear parameters for claiming such damages. Over the years Circuit Courts adopted varying standards. Both the Second and Eleventh Circuits have interpreted this Court’s standard in Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District to apply to the Rehabilitation Act. However, as of this year and specifically stemming from this case, the Second and Eleventh Circuit split an already fragmented Rehabilitation Act standard regarding the definition of “official.” The questions presented are: 1. Whether the Gebser standard, requiring an official decision from an entity to impose monetary damages, applies to the Rehabilitation Act. 2. Whether the Second Circuit erroneously defined “official” under that standard.

Docket Entries

2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-12-20
Waiver of right of respondent Kathleen Biondo to respond filed.
2019-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 23, 2019)

Attorneys

Kaleida Health
John Patrick DanieuRoach, Brown, McCarthy & Gruber, P.C., Petitioner
John Patrick DanieuRoach, Brown, McCarthy & Gruber, P.C., Petitioner
Kathleen Biondo
Andrew RozynskiEisenberg & Baum, LLP, Respondent
Andrew RozynskiEisenberg & Baum, LLP, Respondent