No. 19-6545

Bradly M. Cunningham v. Washington County, Oregon, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-07
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 8th-amendment civil-rights civil-rights-violation cruel-and-unusual-punishment cruel-unusual-punishment due-process habeas-corpus illegal-sentence parole-board section-1983 sentencing torture
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Issues being raised

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW 1. Am J able to pursue relief under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 against the for pre-trial Torture? 2. Am I able to pursue relief under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 against the for an illegal sentence? i. BRAD CUNNINGHAM 10456927 2605 STATE STREET SALEM, OREGON 97310 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES BRADLY CUNNINGHAM, USSCNo. PETITIONER, Ninth Circuit No. 18-35413 USDC No. 6:18-CV-00049-SI VS. WASHINGTON COUNTY; OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE; and, JANE AND JOHN DOES | — 100, RESPONDENTS. I hereby certify the following individuals and entities are interested in this case and its outcome: Bradly Cunningham, Plaintiff, Pro se 10456927 2605 State Street Salem, OR 97310 Ellen F, Rosenblum OSB No. 753239 Attorney General State of Oregon 1162 Court St., NE Salem, OR 97301 503/378-6002 October 14, 2019 Respectfully submitted, Bradly eric CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS 1 BRAD CUNNINGHAM 10456927 2605 STATE STREET SALEM, OREGON 97310 |

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-10-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2019)

Attorneys

Bradly M. Cunningham
Bradly M. Cunningham — Petitioner
Bradly M. Cunningham — Petitioner