Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation of the relevant legal principles

No question identified. : . PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner, ‘pro se’ Julian Marcus Raven respectfully petitions the Supreme Court of the United States for a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. OPINIONS BELOW The order granting Summary Affirmance to Respondents is attached at to this filing. A The Denial of Rehearing ‘en banc’ is attached to this filing. B The ‘Mandate’ of the Court is attached. C The District Court Opinion is attached to this filing. D JURISDICTION OF THE COURT This Court has jurisdiction over the instant case pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. Section 1254(1) Cases in the courts of appeals may be reviewed by the Supreme Court by the following methods: (1) By writ of certiorari granted upon the petition of any party to any civil or criminal case, before or after rendition of judgment or decree; Supreme Court Rule 10(a) A United States court of appeals has entered a decision in conflict with the decision of another United States court of appeals on the same important matter; has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with a decision by a state court of last resort; or has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, or sanctioned such a departure by a lower court, as to call for an exercise of this Court’s supervisory power; The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rendered its order granting Respondent’s motion for Summary Affirmance on May 17", 2019 Petitioner then filed both a Petition for Rehearing by the Appeals Court Panel and a Petition for Rehearing ‘en banc’. The Petition for Rehearing ‘en banc’ was denied on August 12", 2019. The Petition for Panel Rehearing received a ‘Mandate’ on the 23 of August 2019 stating that the original order of the court is the formal mandate of this court. JURISDICTON OF THE COURT OF ORIGINAL INSTANCE Supreme Court Rule 14(g)(ii) Jurisdiction in the court of first instance: U.S. Code § 1331: The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. §11501 Civil Jurisdiction (c) relating to the execution or validity of wills devising real property within the District of Columbia, and of wills and testaments properly presented for probate in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and the admission to probate and recording of those wills; iv PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUION AND OF LAW ’ This case involves: 1. The ‘FREE SPEECH? clause to the 1*t Amendment to the United States Constitution: “Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech” 2. The ‘DUE PROCESS’ clause of the 5“ Amendment to the United States Constitution: “No person shall be... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; “ 5 Amendment to the United States Constitution 3. The ‘EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW’ provision in the 5™ Amendment to the United States Constitution: “No person shall be... deprived of life, ; liberty, or property, without due process of law;” ; 4. The ‘COMMON LAW OF TRUSTS’ expressed in the District of Columbia’s Uniform Trust Code and the Restatement of Trusts. v