No. 19-6549
Jose Laureano Salgado v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-disclosure brady-v-maryland constitutional-rights criminal-appeal direct-appeal due-process exculpatory-evidence impeachment ongoing-disclosure pending-appeal prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess HabeasCorpus
ERISA DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does this Court's holding in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) require the Government to disclose, while an appeal is pending, exculpatory or impeaching information to the defendant?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Does this Court’s holding in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) require the Government to disclose, while an appeal is pending, exculpatory or impeaching information to the defendant? i
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent