Whether the Mayor of Los Angeles and California courts have unlawfully and unethically ignored Supreme Court precedent and higher court rulings

QUESTIONS PRESENTED These questions significantly impact the administration of Civil and Constitutional violations by the Mayor of Los Angeles and the : , . ; justice system in California Courts 1. The issues that Petitioner challenges in her Claim have already been adjudged and struck down as unconstitutional in prior cases heard by SCOTUS and many State and Federal Courts,. . All that could have been heard has been heard. With an avalanche of Law supporting Petitioner’s Claim, is it lawful or ethical for a Mayor, a City, and two lower Courts to ignore the ; : ; Supreme Law of the Land and higher Court rulings and precedent, or is this an Abuse of Discretion and Deprivation of Inalienable , Rights and Liberties? : ; 2. Were it not for the remand of this case back to the District Court on Petitioner’s first Appeal, Defendants would never have had to answer the subject Claim themselves, as the District Court sheltered, protected, and answered for Defendants from its commencement. Moreover, the Answer submitted by Defendants was utterly non-responsive. Does-a District Court err in shielding and litigating a case for Defendants since its inception or is this in violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct that requires : : a Judge to respect, comply, and be faithful to the Supreme Law and maintain professional competence? . 3. _— Petitioner filed the majority of her papers to the District Court Clerks via mail; some papers were refused and returned after the remand: some were accepted but not filed by Order of _ a . the Magistrate. CCP § 632; CRC Rule 3.1590 (d) & (n), and 14/e) Filing With the Court Defined: “The filing of pleadings and other papers with the court as required by these rules shall be made by : : filing them with the clerk of the court... The clerk shall not refuse to accept for filing any paper presented for that purpose solely because it is not presented in proper form as required by . these rules-or any rule of practice.” Does a District Court err in _ ordering its clerks not accept a litigant’s papers and err in nN ordering its Clerks to accept but not file a litigant’s papers? & [ay 4. Does a District Court err in repeatedly seeking numerous _ meager excuses and reasons to dismiss a litigant’s good faith Claim based on unshakeable, indisputable facts and Law? 5. Does any Court have the authority to reject any indigent litigant’s in Forma Pauperis status after granting it for years, or is this in violation of Government Code §§ 68630-68641? 6. After more than two years of litigating a case with the Judges, what justifies a Dismissal declaring a Claim is frivolous and ; : not filed in good faith when the issues presented are not in . conflict with the Supreme Law or decisions of thousands of . ‘ important State and Federal courts? Would it then follow that : the Constitution, binding Law, and Authorities cited in a Claim are ; . also frivolous? Can such an absurd ruling be allowed to stand? , 7. Whena litigant is not allowed a fair Trial, or any Trial, and is forced to litigate with District Court Magistrates for over two years, then endure the deprecation of litigant’s motives in filing suit based on clear and determined Law, would this Supreme Court agree that this type of behavior on the part of a Magistrate who is supposed to be unbiased and follow the Canons of her job description, destroys the credibility of the judiciary and undermines public confidence in the judicial process? And that the Magistrate is acting in bad faith? ; 8, ls parking and traveling in one’s personal, non-commercial, . private automobile along the public streets, highways, roads, and byways of the United States of North America without forced , registration, et al, a right as supported by many thousands of To ~ State and Federal Court rulings; the Articles ‘of Confederation, as ' Magna Carta, and a plethora of well-settled Law, or a “privilege” that must be taxed and regulated as DMV demands? 2