Whether failure to conduct a proximate cause and apportionment analysis as required by this Court's decision in Paroline v. United States, 572 U.S. 434 (2014) before entering an order of restitution affects the fairness, integrity and public reputation of the proceedings and satisfies the fourth prong of plain error

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether failure to conduct a proximate cause and apportionment analysis as required by this Court’s decision in Paroline v. United States, 572 U.S. 434 (2014) before entering an order of restitution requiring a single defendant to pay the entire amount of a victim’s loss affects the fairness, integrity and public reputation of the proceedings and satisfies the fourth prong of plain error? ii