Whether a detective's interrogation of a suspect at the suspect's home and secret recording of the suspect without consent, court authorization, or a warrant violates the 4th, 5th, and 14th Amendment rights

Questions Presented : . The Appellant alleged that defense counsel was | ; ineffective for failing to investigate illegal acts by | Detective Burkett, which violated the Appellant’s 4th, 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution, and Article I, Section 9, 12, 23 of the Florida Constitutional rights. | 1.Is it unlawful for a detective to interrogate a | suspect while at his house and secretly record the ; suspect without consent from the — suspect, ; authorization from the courts, nor a warrant? ; 2.If a suspect is being interrogated while at his house and is secretly being recorded, does the 5th ; Amendment self-incrimination also apply to the 4th | Amendment right to privacy? | THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS | The Appellant, Maurice Joseph, respectfully | asks that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment and opinion of the 11" Circuit Court of Appeals, rendered in this proceedings on July 5", ~ 2019. :