No. 19-6573
Garron Gonzalez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment cell-phone cell-phone-privacy civil-rights constitutional-rights digital-evidence effective-assistance-of-counsel fourth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel probation probation-search search-and-seizure suppression-of-evidence unreasonable-search
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fourth Amendment required suppression of evidence found during warrantless interception of incoming calls on a jailed probationer's cell phone
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED i) Whether the Fourth Amendment’ fequired Suppression OF evidence Found during Warrankiess inteccep Hon OF ‘NCOMing bexk Wess B9es On @ Jailed Probetoner's Ce\\ Phone 2 IN Vid rhe Rrobvabionel's Search Condition BY rho te THY Wis Cellphone be Sublect FO Seerenk sierore_ . Wirhovk 2 Werrant 7 B) Was keie\ Counsel met fective Coc Feiling yo File. Cegvested Morvorn to Supecess Cel! Phone WW dence? In ttt
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-08-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 12, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent