Whether state and federal officials, including judges, can lawfully commit crimes, legally cover up their commission, and repeatedly usurp their own courts to conceal those crimes

No question identified. : CERTIORARI FOR JOHN GARRETT SMITH 1. QUESTIONS INVOKING WRIT (4) Is it lawfully permissible for State and federel officials, including judges, to commit crimes, legally aver their commission, and yet repetitively usurp their qun courta to coneeal those crimes? (ii) Is it lawfully permissible for the same State and federal officials, including judges, ta actively perticipate in breaches of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution to steal Liberty as a weapon to hide the theft of Property, : all without Due Process of Law in willful violation of 18 USCS §1030 (a), (5)(c), (2)(1), (2), (8) [the CFAAR] to sabotage interstate and international commerce? : (iii) Is it lawfully parmissible for the same State and federal officials, including judges, to aggressively ignore the universal and non-indemnifying requirement oF 18 USCS §§ 3 & 4& (prohibitions to Accomplicament toe and Misprisicn nf Felony, respectively) by ANYONE, but instead to usurp their Courts to bury Paramount Antecedent/ reports of provan and averred crimes banesth secondary appellate minutiae? 2. BASTS FOR JURISDICTION OF THE Scotus Per Rule 13, this filing is timely and lower courts have triggered open this = doar far accountability to the US Constitution vie writ of Certierari from this Court. The following Exhibits verify the present Jurisdiction of this Court to adjudicate with prudence: Exhibit 1 CoA / Sth Cir, judgment, 10.1.19 (DKT #48 in USDD #3:19-cv-05394) Exhibit 2 Petitioner's Motion, 8.7.19 (DKT #10 in USDC #3:19-cv-05394) ... Exhibit 3 ... that was Denied by the USDC on 9.11.19 (DKT #14 in 3:19-cv05394), and Exhibit 4 ~ a separate but relevant epitame ef burying LEGAL NOTICE OF CRIMINAL ACTS, this time by a Court Clerk who, herself, IS ALSO A DEFAULT DEFENDANT in substantial Litigation. . @ Exlibit S— ogpee af DSH IS SAL by 4s Ct Appeals; jgnerieg CRIMES VE, 1& HSCS et TIT. DIRECT & CONCISE ARGUMENT AMPLIFVING REASONS FOR THIS WRIT : §3,84 [@re” reg All levels af Courts in the Western US are operating under the following. 2h RNS rubric: 254 (Sz. ee ee "SQ LONG AS COURTS COVER FOR CRIMES COMMITTED BY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, THOSE CRIMES ARE ACCEPTABLE." Of course, this is preposterous. Wo Court fe above the Law itself. The Petitioner is serving a 12 year sentence for the crime of attempted murder despite that facts that State's oun records prave that the sham cess was a4 police-fabricated hoex executed ta conceal tha theft of Petitioner's Corporate, Personal and Intellectual properties; crimes that commenced BEFORE the prestaged incident, only months later fabricated further still to pawn off an attemat to kill that never heppened. Net only are these statements proven im thousands of police records, but they have baen unanimously and irrevocably everred by dozena of government officials 2/3 CERTIORARI FOR JOHN GARRETT SMITH who have collapsed into default stetus in a non-habeas civil action for the substantial pecuniary damages still being caused by these gavernmant crimes (in State of Washington Superior Court Case No. 18-2-303-14) . Furthermore, the entire sham case of John Garrett Smith is shrouded in pathetic hy-jinx in defiance of the simple Public Records Act (RCW 42.56) that the State af Washington is aggressively breaking by refusing ta disclose vital and obvious exculpatory evidences (also in viclation of ‘RADY’ stendards). Worst of all, and the Cause for this Emergency Injunctive llrit, is that dozens of the default defendants for the non-indemnified crimes against Petitioner are Court officials, including judges, that persist in spuriously presiding over the aforelisted cases. The judgments cited in the Exhibits are relevant because they have each been MADE BV COURT OFFICIALS (including judges) WHO ARE ACTIVELY GUILTY OF THE VERY CRIMES FOR WHICH PETITIONER SEEKS RELIEF. In no uncertain terms,