John Garrett Smith v. Washington
SocialSecurity Securities
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions
No question identified. : No, | Civ re: WASC. No. 17328 ) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES —felon Gara: Gath. NY PETITIONER = © iP RQ a _ (Your Name) . te a vs. : ‘ . t . Sprie f Washata e ash — RESPONDENT(S) eS ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO Dope Cust at Ste Str 2 [alae > Ugprene ver] ot N R&S KE al ASU MG (NAME OF COURT THAT LAST RYLED ON MERITS OF YOUR CASE) PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI } FILED | OCT 07 289 (YourName) 4#-* BEI E, a (Address) . (City, State, Zip Code) _| RECEIVED . OCT 31 2019 bE : SIG. Zz ZS (Bom QUBIGE OF THE Clea . (Phone Number) , ol duxt so) ME COURT. US 22 Oster 2B(F St 4. QUESTIONS INVOKING WRIT A. Is it legally permissible far a State Superior Court to acknowledge that State's witness is openly committing multiple counts of "perjury worthy of impeachment", and yet each time rule ta strike the testimony from the record in order to’ sustain an ensuing jury-less triel based upon averred fraud? 8) Tevit legally permissible for State Courts to fail ta follow Constitutional Oue Process (4th Amendment) by failing to ratify Probable Cause at indictment for want of Legitimate evidence, and yet adjudicate enyway in the absence of jurisdiction that can ONLY be obtained by ratification of Probable Cause? C) Is it legally permissible for State Courts to excuse a reasonable cause for : injustice, namely bias, in order to then tatally ignore the devastating EFFECTS of that manifest injustice in the forms of Perjury and Fraud to obtain false . convictian? : 2. BASIS FOR JURISDICTION This Petition is timely based upon State of Washington Supreme Court's Order te Dismiss on 9.26.19, and the Washington Court of Appeals’ Order of Transfer . deted 7.2.19. moa, ‘ Because all levels af State Courts have completely refused'/ failed ta even address the severe Constitutional breaches of germaine Law regarding Dua . Process, Petitioner stands on this rightful eppeal to simple Justice to the . ~ Supreme Court of the United Stetes, : 3.