No. 19-6580

In Re Marcus Simpson

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-11-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure court-system due-process judicial-power judicial-usurpation legal-remedy mandamus perjury power-abuse standing usurpation-of-power
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether perjury amounts to a judicial usurpation of power, therefore mandamus (Lie)

Question Presented (from Petition)

question presented. But the State’s Courts the (“ System”), refuses to adjudicate. . QUESTION PRESENTED Whether perjury amounts toa judicial usurpation of power , therefore mandamus (Lie). i 7 .

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-12
Waiver of right of respondent Hamilton County Common Pleas Court Et Al to respond filed.
2019-11-04
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 13, 2019)

Attorneys

Hamilton County Common Pleas Court Et Al
Ronald W. Springman Jr.Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent
Ronald W. Springman Jr.Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent
Marcus Simpson
Marcus Simpson — Petitioner
Marcus Simpson — Petitioner