Whether the trial court erred in denying the defendant's motion for a new trial based on the defense counsel's failure to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defendant

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ONE: wholfon a Gnke, Meyedy TLL D eC 5 poarve HIS wip Foe CN ull is Capable Te Tide: who Our Aolvete Fo The Henle 1 olefardent 7 fag Push? The fh oda ead [rithds Ropuasbed « fry Trial bul the Defense Couns Lnewd Hein Plas. , Threw: whither Tie Trial Lanyon Viv hte Ce 00 , Sel fg Slt? left el ed pets ously B Meysly he. 7 has Toarvned oud Tobe Tpolye Abpresison pfu Gee drexesl of the Fir, fun Upon Fok fibifyag offtesall Rears on ff OAT rill Lhe Scurte. fF Ue Linge pours wldlhan AB 0. righ of of Inluest To » Ovligf tile of Apprelabity tos JA Ge Same. pada val rae Hate Crenccllta an PUEL peste 2 le od phere tis COM" Gn Be cokheclted %4f Wee oh concn hoped 75 00 sucf, ang Apple