No. 19-6594

David Ingraham v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2019-11-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: violate the principals of due-process constitutional-fairness due-process eight-amendment eighth-amendment judicial-integrity juvenile-offenders parole stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the decision of the Florida Supreme Court in overturning its previous decision violate due-process,judicial-integrity

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1). Does the decision of the Florida Supreme Court in overturning its previous decision deciding a Federal Constitutional question, violate the principals of due process and judicial integrity where it is obvious that said decision in based upon nothing more than a change in membership of the court and the belief that the previous decision was wrongly decided? (2). Does the decision of this Court in Virginia v. LeBlanc, 37 S.Ct. 1726 (2017),” clarify that the Florida Supreme Court misapplied United States Supreme Court oo _precedent in previously concluding Florida’s parole system, as applied to juvenile ~ | offenders, violated the Eight Amendment. ? ; (3) Does the Florida Supreme Court’s reliance upon this Court’s holding in LeBlanc permit the court to properly reconsider and settle, in accords with constitutional , fairness and the principles of Stare Decisis, the issue of whether Florida’s parole system violates petitioner’s Eight Amendment right? ii

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-01-22
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-09-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 13, 2019)

Attorneys

David Ingraham
David Ingraham — Petitioner
David Ingraham — Petitioner