No. 19-6622
Helene Tonique Williams v. Toni Preckwinkle, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-review due-process federal-jurisdiction free-speech judicial-discretion patent procedural-dismissal standing state-court-procedure takings
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court erred in dismissing the case against Pliner Porgue A Mhams, et al.
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 7 Pliner Porgue A MhamS tce.fl lhe. fe pesto Lobes The Lothar stett-oF ZHlhizerS Enter, Avia, Nes henpect My Constitedrnal Mala fo Phe Cour aed or le. btrxauS Witty ta! Greoudire, OrdleFavelaase, IS-2-BU3, AID | | Fhelare Brcgee, CdltwerS YS Freckle etal, Why tHe OlistictCru? Miele! Serie_ NRachints 10 the “Py Rreckwihhlle, eal. Case a Semon, lohy Wud the, Coe Atspissecl for belrg PY volns. TA ikke, te have both Cb (B-Y-622 arcf 19-2219 move. to the Supreme Couck of the United Stes ! U[Yeot
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-13
Waiver of right of respondent Toni Preckwinkle, et al. to respond filed.
2019-11-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 13, 2019)
Attorneys
Toni Preckwinkle, et al.
Paul Anthony Castiglione — Cook County State, Respondent
Paul Anthony Castiglione — Cook County State, Respondent