No. 19-6629
Jacqueline M. King v. District of Columbia, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-charges driver's-license drivers-license due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment notice notice-requirement parking-tickets suspension
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
ERISA DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District of Columbia violated Petitioner's due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the District of Columbia violated Petitioner’s due process | rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution : by suspending Petitioner's drivers license for unpaid parking tickets without prior notice that such suspension could occur and result in criminal charges
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-05
Waiver of right of respondent District of Columbia to respond filed.
2019-09-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 13, 2019)
Attorneys
District of Columbia