No. 19-6632

Samier Patrick Clark v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: adam-walsh-act civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-counsel prosecutorial-misconduct sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was petitioner subjected to violations of his Constitutional rights throughout the criminal prosecution?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : 1) _ Was petitioner subjective to violations of his Constitutional rights throughout : the course of his criminal prosecution? . : 2) Was petitioner subjective to an illegal sentence as it ‘rélates to the U.S.S.G., ; §3553 and the provisions of Rule 32? . | ee, ; 3) Is the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, unconstitutional ©, as enacted by Congress? ; 4) Was petitioner subjected to double jeopardy in conviction of charges which "go hand-in-hand"? 5) Was petitioner subjective to ineffective or deficient represenation of defense ; counsel during his criminal prosecution? . 6) Was petitioners case prejudiced against him due to the unprofessional actions ° federal agent investigating his criminal complaint? 7) Was petitioner's case further prejudiced by prosecutorial and judicial misconduct . which went un-challenged by his defense counsel?

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-11-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 16, 2019)

Attorneys

Samier Patrick Clark
Samier Patrick Clark — Petitioner
Samier Patrick Clark — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent