No. 19-6639
Anthony Andrews v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2255 civil-procedure collateral-attack due-process habeas-corpus new-judgment one-year-time-period statute-of-limitations successive-motions
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Under 28 USC 2255(h), does the denial of a second or successive motion constitute a 'new judgment' restarting the one-year time period for filing 2255 motions?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ) Under 28 usc. 2255(h), Ts Anbeus nomericall Second aass motion Second wo Svccessive. Where dhe basis Ly his claim did NOT Qvise ont | able, dhe distwier CourT denied hig De aAa5ss Motions LE Not il . a) a . eh ' } Does oN officek Cenuicd ods Constitute @ ARS Df | restating Yhe one-J Te op es? SS a~ s) . ear Ss th e of Laide g On) 2285 Motions ? “s
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-01-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-06
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-12-16
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.
2019-11-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 16, 2019)
2019-06-18
Application (18A1316) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until October 31, 2019.
2019-06-10
Application (18A1316) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 1, 2019 to October 31, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Anthony Andrews
Anthony Andrews — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent