No. 19-6640
Ramelus D. Bradley v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment circuit-court circuit-court-review civil-rights federal-law federal-law-violation fourth-amendment gps-tracking jones-v-united-states search-and-seizure supreme-court-precedent vehicle-search
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-12-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the circuit court erred when it failed to find that the state court had violated federal law and in doing so, violated petitioner Bradley's Fourth Amendment rights by placing a GPS tracking device on his vehicle after this Court issued its decision in Jones?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED : Whether the circuit court erred when it failed to find . that the state court had; (1) violated federal law; and (2) in doing so, violated petitioner Bradley's Fourth Amendment rights by placing a GPS tracking device on his vehicle after this Court issued its decision in Jones? ; i PARTIES INVOLVED | All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. 4k .
Docket Entries
2019-12-16
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.
2019-11-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-11-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 16, 2019)
Attorneys
Ramelus Bradley
Ramelus D. Bradley — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent