Whether the warrantless search and seizure of a person's cell phone data violates the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED a ry a Sy . 2 i) Xe \ E NK GH Cm Ses adeno a Ye Yi Xo a Wat Wink! Yes ox ne” eK, eo. tt qn d Say 534 «4 e ° .) e : s & BY) 9 Myer nO Oh AE OS We TO AXES Don Wwe Warm cao Gi AVS 1 \3,20) SY Gadiines) Tne Shoe SE Avon ond Wecisotn toutes SuineSak Couth fhaned } ¥ \ \ Y \ \ ( Yi TK \S s iN iv \\s KN e e e ° ° ° 7 x £ Case : Sieace_ WAG we EGD, Sf om"€ Aime. MONG, Oo ko YevclASS Ae rmes (tee. Sage Ab Lanes dal SF Qauck BANS har RA ESN dcw A a0 b Lave A\_ © Wi dus: Vo al j OT ey -_ % oy AP Eres TODD Gud Bool $0530 a ° ° 4) Whel\vcct: ds LSS Adyseds A ABE “Sd Ss a0: OY Artesting Arie vides Ne. Wire cits ALENEY# Azo S00 C4he WOLPE Anid44I35zDal Filed ADS-D By Orbe c Yao EZ. EV SAMIN SERT A) VER 5y99%y g y e e ~ ee ry 5) MEWS a ori (oN ESS in o na ~~ ws Q WE} ata my .} > TesRy undes Ook August ans Tru Wea GS Ave Nuby Wears ArceSbine eo > wuld: cS we SS NE of Yet De entan . IN Ne ty — ona ) &) weet, Srevey VOD GunlFok at b oA Sw Noe SRY Linder Da Anbu: giv . x 2 an > \B aD MP YA Ashen ‘O wax rcuxe W Yin TAA OC. ry M C an } Ce — 0 . « v YOND Ca Pots" ans ANSASERED SE Sid. one 38 Utes fen F Yes of No! 6 _ One oe, = wae () 7.) Wwe Whe Ge OY Tis EWN RAE) Be DOAN SAA oA. Gad RICANS ~ “ Ww a 5 ae = MMAN*ZO8 On By at eQoshs /Ortinel Daher urs A Suis do wal Ohi O\o¢ ch S ND Sw SMT S&S Fie iat: Ce S N eA ‘in Ty OW) . ba . e0Gc *Ment SOoo'!h* DTA eDor*s Gay waccurTate of WiSe Wick ocd . ote ang av 91) Q D WANE Re San : AS SEEOR DOD, \ WN TARE BA bos AL AS » ~~ e ue Any PLE DECATIME Tine AE PAES aod Cronduck wave, Restle! ¥, F a BWNES AND REGUL ATRoaS esakions cides >A, Des, o® Wo.” « £ a) Wes os No » :