Michael Allen Channel v. Benjamin Marquez, et al.
Whether, False information by an officer or officers can serve as the basis of a claim for denial of the right to a Fair Trial Yes or no?
Whether, officer Marquez, Benjamin ya9 Personally appear at the
Whether, The State o Arizona and Maricopa county superior court Allowed the Fraudulent concealment isa The affirmative suppesion o Liingth the intent to deccive of defraud of amaterially Fact or circumstance that onis lecally (or, Sometime, Morally boud to Tevel-Also termed hidden Fraud. see Pane 48 Lines -d oF August as Jury Tid Testimony by oFFier TOND GUL FO8083
Whether Miranda wis Advised At 2d45hrs Ju 1 a by Aresting oficer under he ARESi AGENC4 AZ0072300 COSe N0:PF201343235700 Fikd 2O13-71D by OFFiCES MAQUEZ BEN JAMIN.SERIAL NUMbER SYAIYS oR N."
Whether, The OFFiCid Filed ArreSting oF Ficer MARQUE2, BENJAMIN#S429 Tetify nder oath Augut tas ry ridas the July Arresng OFFicer For the STATE or Fot the DeFendantYes of No!
Whether, oFFicer ToDD GurL FoRDt8083 lied t the JuRY under Dath AuGust 18 aos when asked by the State Did you Arrest Mr. chanel? And ofFicer D GUL FORD3 ANSWERED I d. PN 38NS -8"Ye Or NO.
WhthEG F FCSG) TOND GUFRD3,SETDAVD MONTYA , d RTCHARD FRMAN on July do in Reforts /oFFia paper wark Fied Juli,3 Make False Teposts of Knowindy enter of cause to be entesed into dry Departtent book, Jecord, or report dny inaccurate of False inermation "Yes OR NO"
WthE OFFIE TODD GUTLFORDSO,SGT DAED MANTOA IdRCHARD sole8 Sworn employees TruthFulness holds up to the Detinition of the PhOrrX POLICE DERARTMET POCy oF RuLES and COndUCt inthe ReV.Ob/4 RULES AD REGULATIONS OEAtiONS OTDEr 3. A.A)"YES OR NO."
Whete A Ru s atd by h Sa co Ma Con "Yes or No."
Whether the warrantless search and seizure of a person's cell phone data violates the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures