No. 19-6646
Paul John Denham v. California
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process evidence-fabrication false-testimony material-evidence materiality napue-v-illinois prosecutorial-misconduct pyle-v-kansas
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-01-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Paul John Denham's Constitutional right to due process was violated
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : .
Docket Entries
2020-01-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.
2019-10-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 16, 2019)