No. 19-6647

Michael J. Baxter v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: acquitted-conduct batson-challenge batson-v-kentucky criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection jury-selection racial-discrimination reasonable-doubt sentencing-guidelines sixth-amendment united-states-v-watts
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration Patent
Latest Conference: 2020-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the striking of two out of three black veniremembers demonstrates a 'pattern of discrimination' as necessary to satisfy the first step of the inquiry pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the striking of two out of three black veniremembers demonstrates a “pattern of discrimination” as necessary to satisfy the first step of the inquiry pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986). 2. Whether the calculation of United States Sentencing Guidelines — which is based on acquitted conduct — violates the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution “as applied” to the Petitioner’s case because the sentence imposed by the district court fell above the range permitted based solely on the conduct found beyond a reasonable doubt by the jury (i.e., whether this Court’s holding in United States v. Watts, 519 U.S. 148 (1997), is still good law). il B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iii

Docket Entries

2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-03
Reply of petitioner Michael J. Baxter filed. (Distributed)
2020-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-16
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2020-02-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 16, 2020.
2020-02-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 14, 2020 to March 16, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-01-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 14, 2020.
2020-01-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 15, 2020 to February 14, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-12-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 15, 2020.
2019-12-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 16, 2019 to January 15, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 16, 2019)

Attorneys

Michael J. Baxter
Michael Robert UffermanMichael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Michael Robert UffermanMichael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent